O
Lynchburg
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock cameras

Lynchburg

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (7)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.

Public comments (8)

OpposedRyan ThomasAug 25, 2026

Said public safety gains don't justify collecting everyone's location data; urged terminating the Flock agreement.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
SupportiveMichael MitchellAug 25, 2026

Told a story of license plate readers helping find a missing elderly relative; urged preserving the technology for missing persons and stolen vehicles.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedJared KaijalaAug 25, 2026

Warned that surveillance infrastructure built for safety today could be misused by future governments; urged ending Flock.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedColin PlankAug 25, 2026

Argued Flock builds location histories on residents without suspicion; urged cancelling the agreement.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedThomas SmithAug 25, 2026

Cited false positive alerts and misuse of ALPR systems elsewhere; urged discontinuing Flock.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedTomas StrakaAug 25, 2026

Feared surveillance expansion or misuse by future governments; urged discontinuing Flock to protect constitutional rights.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedAlan SpauldingAug 25, 2026

Warned surveillance tools can be expanded or misused; urged protecting liberty and privacy.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedJulia MartinyAug 25, 2026

Cited other jurisdictions ending Flock over data sharing and questioned whether ALPRs measurably reduce crime; urged discontinuing Flock.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →