Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Said public safety gains don't justify collecting everyone's location data; urged terminating the Flock agreement.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Told a story of license plate readers helping find a missing elderly relative; urged preserving the technology for missing persons and stolen vehicles.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Warned that surveillance infrastructure built for safety today could be misused by future governments; urged ending Flock.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Argued Flock builds location histories on residents without suspicion; urged cancelling the agreement.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Cited false positive alerts and misuse of ALPR systems elsewhere; urged discontinuing Flock.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Feared surveillance expansion or misuse by future governments; urged discontinuing Flock to protect constitutional rights.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Warned surveillance tools can be expanded or misused; urged protecting liberty and privacy.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →Cited other jurisdictions ending Flock over data sharing and questioned whether ALPRs measurably reduce crime; urged discontinuing Flock.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →